Five essays on the philosophy of nature and subject

It’s a critical question that is existence of natural law a reason for natural

legitimacy? This thesis intends to show “natural judgment” is not exactly

“pure natural sciences judgment”. It is shown that there are some criteria

for differentiation between “natural judgment” and “pure judgment”. The

first step is to discuss natural data and its system; the next step is feasibility

of the judgment. The feasibility performs by “continuous analysis”

concept that is somehow “issue-predicate” analysis of the judgment. In the

final step it discusses natural judgments system and natural rule: Is there

natural rule? Is the world generally legitimate? Discussion about

“computability possibility” is vital in all the parts. Therefore, it is expected

that discuss “possibility” and “episteme based on statistics” and try to

clarify its position; at the end, it discusses that is “possibility” “natural

rule” or “rule of the nature”?

Altogether, this paper has a logical approach on natural issue because it

deals with “natural judgment” with regards to “continues analysis” and

our “access rate” on judgment truth, empirical content of judgments and

also our relative existence to judgement resulted in random analysis.

Continues analysis of “the nature” on predicate and totally on continues

analysis of the nature in nature law reflect the nature. In result, it can offer

a parameter as differential factor of “natural judgment” from “pure

judgment.